FRS 002V — Sec. 001 — (2 units) — CRN 53619 — F 10:00-11:30am— 3132 Tupper
Comparing Mammalian Genomes

Instructor:
Michael Syvanen, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, School of Medicine

Description: Comparative genomics concerns the comparison of DNA sequences of very large regions of genomes. Today there is available large tracts of sequences that remains unanalyzed. This course will begin with a formal presentation that defines the basic elements of the genome and the types of evolutionary questions that can be addressed from comparisons. Students will be assigned a region of the mammalian genome with a goal of comparing and interpreting those comparisons. This is a computationally intense endeavor so analysis of sequences will be carried out either at special websites or from local servers using unix commands. I would expect that the students interested in this seminar to have a good computational background, with or without much biology. These students will learn some basic biology and will be exposed to a number of basic computational problems and how these problems are expressed in the real world of comparative biology. The types of problems that are tackled by the individual students will depend on their previous computer skills. Though any of the problems can be worked on at appropriate websites, more advanced analysis is possible with some the ability to work in unix with programming skills. Each student will come out of this with an enhanced understanding of inheritance and they will be exposed to a real research problem - what is a hypothesis and how computers can be applied to solving scientific questions. All students will be exposed for the first time to the problem of handling and organizing large complex databases.

Format: The instructor will meet with the students two hours each week, perhaps longer for some who have weaker backgrounds. The students will be expected to put in at least 5 hours per week working on their assigned project. Each student will have their own problem but they will all be closely related. Students will be strongly encouraged to work in groups at least part of the time. I have done this type of seminar before (with high school students even) and find that because the students will have large difference in computational skills, the most efficient way to bring the weaker ones up is to pair them with the stronger. Each student will give a report on their findings (or lack thereof) to rest of the group and will write a short description of their analytical methods and results. Grading: The course will be graded in the following manner. At the end of the quarter each student will write up a report on the work they have done over the quarter. This paper will constitute 1/3 of the grade. On the last day, each student will give a 20 minute oral presentation of their paper. This will constitute 1/3 of the grade. The last 1/3 of the grade will be based on participation and preparedness for the regular discussions during the quarter.


About the Instructor: